The temporary telehealth flexibilities that Medicare patients and providers have become accustomed to since the COVID-19 pandemic are set to expire December 31, 2024. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 extended many pandemic era flexibilities...
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Main Contacts
Offices
Overview
Since our establishment in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1908, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP has provided quality legal counsel to our clients enabling them to accomplish more. In recent years, our practice has grown into a national firm that services clients from coast-to-coast, as well as internationally. Today's full-service practice, with more than 750 attorneys, continues the standards established by our founding partners over a decade ago, which are efficient, cost-effective and comprehensive solutions for clients.
Our firm's commitment to quality service extends from our highly-skilled attorneys to our experienced professional staff. By establishing relationships based on trust, communication and responsiveness, we tailor our service to ensure our clients' current needs are met while also anticipating future ones.
Areas of Practice
Professionals
Partners
Christopher J. Azzara
PartnerJohn J. Berry
PartnerChristopher B. Brewer
PartnerJames R. Carlisle
PartnerAnthony A. Ditka
PartnerRobyn B. Eisen
PartnerSean C. Garin
PartnerNicholas J. Godfrey
PartnerMichael Magee
PartnerBryan P. Murray
PartnerBobby M. Palumbi
PartnerAnthony L. Pisano
PartnerJeffrey M. Stacko
PartnerAssociates
Jared M. Bruce
AssociateJason C. Danks
AssociateChad T. Erb
AssociateMelissa N. Fann
AssociateLacey F. Gordon
AssociateTimothy J. Green
AssociateNicholas J. Green
AssociateSarah M. Hillman
AssociateJamie L. Inferrera
AssociateLauren K. Levenson
AssociateVicki H. Mortimer
AssociateRachel L. Pressdee
AssociateRachel R. Ramezan
AssociateLacey F. Scully
AssociateDaniel C. Smolsky
AssociatePaige K. Thomas
AssociateChristi M. Weber
AssociateOf Counsel
Edmund M. Carney [Inactive]
Of CounselJoel M. Helmrich
Of CounselKelli A. Lee
Of CounselBabette Magee
Of CounselRebecca G. Murray
Of CounselClifford A. Pastel
Partner Of CounselDavid J. Singley
Of CounselMichelle L. Weaver
Of CounselC. James Zeszutek
Of CounselOther
Amulya K. Annasamudram
Law ClerkSarah J. Johnson (Non-Attorney)
Patent AgentMichael R. Schofield
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Dinsmore Compliance ServicesJacob E. Wamsley
Law ClerkArticles
Corporate Transparency Act Blocked Nationwide by Texas District Court
On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”).[1] The CTA, and its Reporting Rule, were set to require approximately 32.6 million existing reporting companies to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports with FinCEN by January 1, 2025. Pending further proceedings, or cases that can change this result, reporting companies are not required to comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025 BOI reporting deadline. The government appealed that decision to the Fifth Circuit on December 5...
Press
Dinsmore Announces 16 Partner Promotions, New Board Members and Department Leaders
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP is pleased to announce the elevation of 16 attorneys to partnership, effective January 1, 2025. In addition to these well-earned advancements, the Firm has appointed five new members to its Board of Directors and named a new department chair, further strengthening its leadership team. These promotions and appointments reflect Dinsmore’s ongoing commitment to recognizing talent, creating pathways to growth and positioning the Firm for continued success across its nationwide footprint...
Dinsmore Helps Secure Appellate Victory for Hyundai in Tragic Product Liability Case
The Kentucky Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a defense verdict in favor of Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (“Hyundai”) in a product liability crashworthiness case involving deeply tragic circumstances. The case involved a high-speed, head-on collision in December 2015 that claimed the lives of three family members. The crash occurred when an impaired driver crossed the center line and collided with the family’s vehicle, a Hyundai Tucson. At trial in 2022, plaintiffs alleged that the Tucson contained a manufacturing defect that contributed to the fatalities...